I will consider the story of the one they called Zeus in Greek from the point of view of Euhemerism, which states that the gods were real great men or great heroes of the past who accomplished great things and were deified after they died.

According to this perspective, Zeus/Jupiter may be regarded as a very great man of the past who had the most advanced way of thinking, the most advanced teachings and the most advanced knowledge in the world and at the period of time he lived in.

As I mentioned in the previous posts about this topic, Prometheus would be best regarded as a mediocre man with little preparation or with limited potentiality for greatness or creativity, who lived alongside the great man who was later called Zeus or Jupiter, and who by jealousy, hubris, conceit, attachment to old ways of thinking, and by misguided actions, betrayed and tried to trick and hurt that great man who was his contemporary.

I will try to compare Prometheus (as accurately as possible) to historical characters or potential historical characters in order to give a better idea about his character, his personality, and his historical role.

The following comparison is not totally accurate, but it gives an idea about someone Prometheus could be approximately and reasonably compared to.

If Prometheus had lived at the time of Pythagoras, he would have been someone (more or less) comparable to Cylon of Croton.

Here is how Iamblichus describes Cylon in his *Life of Pythagoras:*

*“Cylon, a Crotoniate and leading citizen by birth, fame and riches, but otherwise a difficult, violent, disturbing and tyrannically disposed man, eagerly desired to participate in the Pythagorean way of life. He approached Pythagoras, then an old man, but was rejected because of the character defects just described. When this happened Cylon and his friends vowed to make a strong attack on Pythagoras and his followers. Thus a powerfully aggressive zeal activated Cylon and his followers to persecute the Pythagoreans to the very last man. Because of this Pythagoras left for Metapontium and there is said to have ended his days.”*

Cylon had no notable historical importance or greatness by himself, but he is remembered because he interacted with a very great thinker, mathematician and philosopher named Pythagoras. He tried to follow Pythagoras, but when he couldn’t or was rejected, he tried to hurt the great man.

The next comparison involves a fictional or hypothetical character (comparable to Prometheus) who would have lived at the time of Isaac Newton. This character (let’s just call him P) would have belonged to a somewhat well-to-do family, and would have been a student at Trinity College, Cambridge, between 1668 and 1671, or (if not a student) would have been someone whose job or (non-academic) work was related to Trinity College and Cambridge.

P would have made the acquaintance of Newton at Cambridge, who sometimes invited him to his office or quarters, and showed him some of his mathematical and physical papers, and some blueprints or sketches related to the reflecting telescope he was designing.

P had no interest in and no potential for mathematical, philosophical, intellectual or scientific innovation or creativity, and he might have had conservative religious and philosophical ideas and opinions (most likely reading very few books and sticking to the ideas of ancient thinkers such as Aristotle).

P visited Newton and inquired about his work and papers. He became more and more jealous of Newton, realizing or seeing that Newton might publish his papers and design a new telescope to be shown to the Royal Society in the near future, thus becoming known and famous and an important person. Newton started to notice P’s attitude and his envious words and behavior, but he didn’t give it too much attention, and tried to gradually distance himself from P, and to conceal his work and papers from others until he was ready to publish them or make them known.

People were able to write philosophical, scientific or pseudo-scientific papers at the time of Newton, and telescopes existed before Newton, but Newton was unique at the period of time when he was alive, in the sense that he was a very great man capable of great creativity and innovation in science, mathematics, (natural) philosophy, and the design of telescopes or scientific instruments (Newton’s interest in alchemy and occult studies will not be discussed here). This relates to the idea that humans might have known elementary or rudimentary ways to use fire (and related technology) at the time of Zeus and Prometheus, but Zeus was the one capable of using fire (and related technology or applications) in very creative, useful and innovative ways.

One day, P waited for an opportunity when Newton left his office for a short period of time without closing the door. He went into Newton’s office, or probably sent a servant of his to Newton’s office, and took away a number of Newton’s scientific and mathematical papers, as well as a sketch and a piece or two of the telescope Newton was designing.

It is evident that Newton was very angry and upset when he saw that his papers and work had been stolen. He knew from the previous behavior of P that he was the culprit. He tried to talk to P, and he even reached out to P’s family, and tried to negotiate with them for weeks in order to get back what was stolen. P denied having anything to do with what happened, and even feigned to be shocked and offended when Newton said he just wanted his work and papers back and he wouldn’t hold anyone accountable and forget the whole thing if everything was returned.

Fortunately Newton had duplicates or drafts of most of his papers, but he had to rewrite some of the papers, and to remake the stolen pieces of the telescope he was building. He also had to keep quiet and wait for some time before he could get justice for himself and retribution for the culprit. During that time, P hid what he had stolen in his house. He sometimes showed the papers to some people he knew well, and tried to sell the telescope pieces and some of the papers but was unsuccessful. He tried to read Newton’s scientific papers but couldn’t understand them. He scribbled some nonsensical words or some poems or songs on some of the papers, and threw one or two papers away, but he kept most of them hidden.

Newton had to wait more than a decade, until he became a productive member of the Royal Society, or until he published the *Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, *and became a known, recognized and important scientific figure*. *Then he was able to act appropriately, exerted pressure on P and his family, and made P give him back what he had stolen and admit everything. P was deservedly, rightfully and justly punished and sent to prison for what he had done.

P was a mediocre person who acted out of jealousy and envy and tried to trick and hurt Newton, without benefitting anybody by his actions. Perhaps many centuries later or more than three millennia later, the details of what happened between P and Newton would become unclear, blurred or lost, and some people or writers would state or conclude (wrongly) that P was a benefactor or a hero who tried to help humans by his act of theft, and that Newton acted hastily or unfairly by punishing P, thus accusing Newton of concealing scientific knowledge and technology away from humans and of being unhelpful to humanity.

And here is in my opinion another fairly close comparison.

If Prometheus had lived at the time of Jesus, he would have been comparable to someone named Judas Iscariot.

This comparison might be regarded as somewhat controversial. It also seems that some writers are trying nowadays to rehabilitate Judas.

Whether one is religious or not, I think it ought to be evident that Jesus was the greatest man at the period of time when he was alive. Whether opinions and views about Judas change or not, I think that like Prometheus, he ought to be considered as someone who lived in the presence of a man of the greatest historical importance, and like Prometheus, he didn’t have intrinsic historical importance or greatness, but his actions were a “catalyzer” or a “catalyst” for subsequent important events.

From the ancient narratives, stories and myths about Zeus, it is known that he lived a long life and died at an advanced age. By the nature of his life, the one they called Zeus in Greek was able to hold Prometheus accountable and to justly punish him while he was alive.

I hope this analysis provided reasonable, coherent, valid and correct explanations and interpretations concerning the story of Prometheus and his punishment. Hopefully additional or better arguments or some new evidence would emerge in the future, confirming or corroborating the analysis given in this post and the previous ones.

]]>

The millionth decimal digit of π is **1** (verified with Mathematica).

The 10 millionth decimal digit of π is found to be **7**, and the 100 millionth decimal digit of π is **2**.

The billionth decimal digit of (in base 10) is **9** (verified with Mathematica).

The 2 billionth decimal digit of π is found to be **0** (this result takes a longer time to compute with Mathematica).

Here are some (repeated) number sequences or numeric strings found among the first 2 billion decimal digits of π.

The numeric string **777777777** appears at the 24, 658, 601 st decimal digit of π :

99194082457597185304**777777777**24846769425931046864

The numeric string **111111111** appears at the 812, 432, 526 th decimal digit of π :

28914504449906917135**111111111**00399876875718824885

Here are also two numeric strings from 1 to 9 in increasing order and decreasing order:

The numeric string **123456789** appears at the 523, 551, 502 nd decimal digit of π:

72604899173238892072**123456789**22486448188070486710

The numeric string **987654321** appears at the 719, 473, 323 rd decimal digit of π :

52213986632415267936**987654321**60793011913242320510

The numeric strings above can be calculated or found with the help of the following link or web page:

Irrational Numbers Search Engine

The numerical value of to 1000 decimal digits is equal to:

**36.46215960720791177099082602269212366636550840222881873870933592293407436888169990462007987570677485436814688343670070542736699139359264431565675267180230917777595737242260530320050233549595161382594571885422222305402433199779769167302876444780028452117394296018175249159350019492001619423210110480018557258718860782819839215304503453543238476218257664861595609057280314341958390400811991506636066295817900302292747422204210046403709493285441101884797707466358510710362803891181156618083260884536505255311095948029552909133361385823497120761861157606574436205295895657736468959837126404885207348833917602169536002174958035720670509318770633086434935593202425189496008880555048213388792769304015639745480898380866639428337794250284522113741878602793251848366623602214652151453276098545038540482041645516919082097210265379423765817354600472953993840487842116366153365057093066926223775915023204727672609958737278566633593210689698807508602353552267490321670730929373240451651980750157959708689483469068**

Two expressions involving π and infinite sums:

Representation of π in continued fraction form:

The sum of π and *e*, the base of natural logarithms, is equal to:

The letter* i* represents the imaginary unit of complex numbers.

Another expression involving π, *e*, and an infinite product:

And here is an identity relating the Golden Ratio, π, *e*, and the imaginary unit *i*:

The value of π can be deduced from the identity above:

]]>I think it would be convenient to distinguish between the general term “science”, referring to the state or fact of knowing, or to knowledge acquired by study and learning, and the modern meaning of “science”, mostly referring to mathematics and to the exact sciences using the rules of the scientific method (astronomy, physics…).

Philosophy and science were not separate in Antiquity.

In the original sense, philosophy meant the love, study, or pursuit of wisdom, or the knowledge of things and their causes, theoretical as well as practical.

Pythagoras was a mathematician, and at the same time it is said that he was the first one to call himself a philosopher, or “lover of wisdom”.

Plato was a philosopher who recommended the knowledge and the study of geometry. In *The Republic*, Plato thought that the best ruler was the king-philosopher.

Aristotle studied nature and wrote works about physics, biology, logic, etc, from a philosophical point of view.

According to the OED:

“In the Middle Ages, ‘the seven (liberal) sciences’ was often used synonymously with ‘the seven liberal arts’, for the group of studies comprised by the Trivium (Grammar, Logic, Rhetoric) and the Quadrivium (Arithmetic, Music, Geometry, Astronomy).”

The expression Natural philosophy was frequently used for centuries :

** “Natural philosophy** or **philosophy of nature** (from Latin *philosophia naturalis*) was the philosophical study of nature and the physical universe that was dominant before the development of modern science. It is considered to be the precursor of natural science.

From the ancient world, starting with Aristotle, to the 19th century, the term “natural philosophy” was the common term used to describe the practice of studying nature. It was in the 19th century that the concept of “science” received its modern shape with new titles emerging such as “biology” and “biologist”, “physics” and “physicist” among other technical fields and titles; institutions and communities were founded, and unprecedented applications to and interactions with other aspects of society and culture occurred. Isaac Newton‘s book *Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica* (1687), whose title translates to “Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy”, reflects the then-current use of the words “natural philosophy”, akin to “systematic study of nature”. Even in the 19th century, a treatise by Lord Kelvin and Peter Guthrie Tait, which helped define much of modern physics, was titled *Treatise on Natural Philosophy* (1867).**“**

In the last few centuries, alchemy separated from chemistry, astrology separated from astronomy, and there was also a certain separation between philosophy on one side, and mathematics and the exact sciences on the other side.

Mathematics became progressively the most prominent and the essential scientific discipline, it is acknowledged as the language of science and of the physical world.

Philosophy is nowadays often regarded as a reflection, view or study of the general principles of a particular branch of knowledge, or activity. There is a philosophy of science, philosophy of mathematics, philosophy of education ,etc.

Some theories or views related to epistemology (which is concerned with the general theory and the study of knowledge) and philosophy, such as rationalism, empiricism, and positivism, share a number of principles with the scientific approach to events and phenomena.

(Source of the image above: Wikimedia Commons)

A scientist or a physicist can also be a philosopher. Important thinkers can be philosophers and create philosophical systems, but modern philosophers must take into account the advances, discoveries and theories in modern science. A historical example would be Immanuel Kant elaborating his philosophical system and philosophical ideas at the end of the eighteenth century in light of and in relation to the exact sciences known at that time, especially Euclidean geometry and Newtonian classical physics and mechanics.

]]>I also wrote an answer on November 9 , 2016 , reminding of the answer I wrote in June and giving additional explanations concerning my point of view and my ideas.

I will present here the two answers I wrote (with a few unessential modifications) , and part of a third answer I wrote .

Here is the first answer of June 18 , 2016:

First of all , I’d like to point out that I’m not involved in politics and I’m not attached to any political ideology , but I’m going to try to give my (objective and concise) opinion about this topic .

Based upon my many readings and my personal reflections , I think an objective study of historical events can be conducted , and the principles of the scientific method can even be applied to History , if it is done the right way .

I think Trump would be the president of the USA based mainly on two reasons or two notions:

- The notion that (along with historical progress and evolution) there are “periodicities” , regularities , and exact correspondences or analogies between (human) historical events over periods of two thousand years or two millennia , which is why I would call them bi-millenary correspondences .
- The notion of inversion or transmutation of values , more or less related to Nietzsche’s ideas .

For the first notion , there is an exact correspondence between the Roman emperor Claudius and Trump . According to the Wikipedia article about Claudius (who ruled from 41 to 54 CE) , it was reported that “at one time he expelled the Jews from Rome, probably because the Jews within the city caused continuous disturbances[…]” and the Wikipedia note states : “There is some debate about what actually happened. It is reported by Suetonius and in Acts (18:2), Cassius Dio minimizes the event and Josephus—who was reporting on Jewish events—does not mention it at all. Some scholars hold that it didn’t happen, while others have only a few missionaries expelled for the short term.” This event corresponds to Trump’s call to ban Muslims from the USA .

For the second notion , it is known that Claudius was the first Roman Emperor to be born outside Italy . This is to be contrasted with Trump’s birther ideas or birther issue , insisting that the president should be a natural born citizen of the United States .

These explanations or ideas may seem new or strange or “exotic”, but I think I have a point here .

So we’ll have to wait for the verification of what I have stated above with the unfolding of future events .

**Update (November 9, 2016) :**

Trump has been elected president. It looks like the unfolding of events has provided an empirical or “experimental” verification of what I had written about five months before the November elections. In fact this answer was written on June 18, 2016.

Here is my second answer , published November 9 , 2016:

I think a statement such as “I told you so” is in order here. I wrote an answer on June 18, 2016 about why Trump would win the November presidential elections. Not that I follow any politician, I’m not attached to any particular political person, political party, or political philosophy.

I presented or outlined a general method based on the proper , correct , and rational analysis of current events and of related specific past historical events (which took place too millennia ago) , and a way to find connections , correspondences and analogies with current events , and to reasonably , objectively anticipate future important events. This method may need more explanations, refinements, or elaborations, but I think it is correct and valid. I’d consider that the unfolding of recent events can be regarded as an empirical or experimental proof or verification of what I had stated earlier in June.

There is no need to refer to the concept of black swan or to similar notions or interpretations, or to say “this is implausible, nobody could have seen or known this”. Randomness and “black swans” are usually a reflection of our ignorance of all the relevant and/or necessary data and facts. The supporters of the winner don’t subscribe to the implausibility or to the black swan narrative and would say that they knew all along he would win the elections. However they represent one side or one of the sides of the issue at hand, so their discourse is not unbiased or dispassionate and is not based on objective and neutral analysis.

I think the impartial , adequate , accurate analysis , study and comparison of historical events and the detection of patterns, regularities , relations and connections between these events can generally help explain the past and also provide insights and valid anticipations of significant future events.

Moreover , The general idea of using scientific methodology (to try to find out who will be the next president for example) is not the core problem , the essential requirement is to use and apply something such as the rules or principles of the scientific method the right way , and to use the right , correct , accurate , adequate, verifiable methodology .

]]>The Black Swan theory or notion can be sometimes useful but it cannot be reliable or subject to generalization for History.

Explaining (or not being able to explain ) historical events by often relying on the concept of Black Swan can be counterproductive and prevents researchers and thinkers from analyzing objectively and impartially human history in order to find patterns , regularities , and reasonable interpretations in accordance with the principles of the scientific method.

I’ll give an example:

The British had a guy called Oliver Cromwell.Then the French had a guy called Napoleon Bonaparte . Then the Germans had a guy called Hitler. So one could discern a pattern here in the historical succession of great powers.

Another example:

There are many important scientists and scholars but a few have an importance or greatness of the biggest caliber.

The British had a very important scientist called Isaac Newton , then the French had a scientist called Pierre Simon Laplace , then the Germans had a scientist called Albert Einstein ( Einstein was born in Germany , then he lived in Switzerland , then he came back to Germany , then he went to the United States.But in his most productive years he was in the sphere of influence of the German language and of the German culture).

An interesting field for studying history is Cliodynamics, but I think the methods of cliodynamics can also be ameliorated and surpassed.

Certain events might be unexpected for a group of people , but they could be expected and/or predictable for another group of people.

A famous event such as the French Revolution was unexpected and could have been viewed as a Black Swan by the French nobles and aristocrats and by the supporters of the Ancien Régime , but it was expected , anticipated and brought about by the ‘bourgoisie’ , the peasants and the common people in France.The English Civil War or the English Revolution can be thought of as an antecedent to the French Revolution.

For the last two centuries the French Revolution and its causes have been explained , interpreted and reinterpreted in many ways by many people and thinkers.

Some events may seem surprising or unexpected , but the big picture and the general structure of historical events can be analyzed , found and interpreted.

As an additional example , I think there is no need to refer to black swans in relation to the 2016 presidential elections in the USA . Things and events to come can be viewed objectively by analyzing past historical events the right way , impartially and coherently , and by making the right and correct connections .

I also think specific patterns , regularities , and connections between important events can be found in human history for (definite) periods extending over centuries and even millennia.

]]>I wrote the poem in French , using the French alexandrine poetic meter of twelve syllables, but I didn’t follow the poetic rules very closely.

I will provide the final version of the poem here , with a line by line English translation. Different people have different tastes and opinions , I hope it will be liked .

The hydrogen-1 atom mentioned in the title of the poem is also called “protium” , but this last word is not much used in French. Protium is the most common hydrogen isotope, having one proton ( and one electron) and no neutrons.

A proton is supposed to be talking or telling the story in the poem . I think I was a little inspired by the poem ” Le Bateau ivre ” by Arthur Rimbaud .

Here it is :

**Bombardement d’atomes par un proton d’hydrogène**^{1}H

**Bombardment of atoms by a proton of protium** ^{1}H

*Synchrotrons , canons à électrons, cyclotrons*

Synchrotrons, electron guns, cyclotrons

*Soyez prêts, particules, deutons, neutrons, hélions*

Be prepared, particles, deutons/deuterons, neutrons, helions

*En attendant que les hommes préparent les canons*

Until men prepare the guns

*Le moment est arrivé, l’appareil frappe*

The moment has come, the apparatus strikes

*Dans son coeur vidé moi, le proton j’attrape*

In its emptied heart I , the proton take

*Le coup et je vais croiser les atomes en grappe*

The blow and I go meet the atoms in clusters

*Je fuis dans l’espace et le temps calculables*

I flee in computable space and time

*Ma vitesse est vertigineuse, incroyable*

My speed is vertiginous, incredible

*Non pas celle de la lumière, infranchissable*

Not that of light, insurmountable

*C’est le lieu de la relativité impie*

It is the place of impious Relativity

*Masses, longueurs, lois de la physique varient*

Masses, lengths, physical laws vary

*Ma trajectoire déterminée sera suivie*

My particular/determined path will be followed

*Par d’autres microcosmes malheureux*

By other unfortunate microcosms

*Le trajet est terminé, le choc a eu lieu*

The journey is over, the shock/collision occurred

*Je donne la vie à de nouveaux corps heureux*

I give life to new happy/fortunate bodies

*Quanta de matière utilisés pour la paix*

Quanta of matter used for peace

*Dans le monde de la science un pas est fait*

In the world of science a step/discovery has been made

*L’humanité en marche en connaît les bienfaits*

Humanity in motion/advancing knows the benefits (of this discovery)

My many readings (see my various book pages and the books I have read) and my analysis of History made me realize that important historical events and phenomena are (highly) periodic , and that exact correspondences (or similarities or “homologies” , one of these terms could be chosen, used and defined) can be found between historical events separated by definite periods of time .

The history of humanity can be considered as the result of the interactions between the lives and actions of human beings moving and acting in time. All humans have a role to play in the unfolding of historical events , but great men (and women) and great thinkers/scientists/reformers constitute the main group of humans who change and drive historical phenomena and happenings across cultures , nations and empires.

Evolution and progress take place in human history , such as technological/scientific progress, the increase in the global human population over millennia and the increase in the surface of political entities, from city-states to nation-states and to bigger entities , etc, but there are also general principles and definite periodicities and regularities in world history. Among these regularities are the stages or phases of gradual growth and decline through which most great powers and empires pass as they rise/fall and go up and down in time. Certain essential periodicities or cycles in history are accompanied by a change or transmutation in values (“moral” , behavioral , sexual, etc).

Relevant concepts can be defined such as the notion of bi-millenary (exact) correspondence and of bi-millenary periodical return of historical events. I will explain and clarify these concepts more when I have time in future writings.

Some philosophical and religious theories talk about eternal return/recurrence and cyclical time (the notion of eternal return constantly permeates the philosophy of Nietzsche), but these notions are not defined in a precise or scientific way.

I think that Mathematics and the scientific method , i.e observing phenomena and collecting data, creating hypotheses with the adequate mathematical model, experimental/empirical verification of these hypotheses and building coherent theories, can be used in and applied to human history, provided that this is done in the proper and correct way. Historical chronology plays an important role, and the chronology of events before the Common or Christian era ought to be revised and corrected.

Another prerequisite for the impartial and objective study of history is to abandon preconceived ideas and to have a global perspective of human history , avoiding euro-centrism , afro-centrism and all kinds of ethnocentrisms , and avoiding to get stuck in certain habits such as classifying people and cultures into Western and non-Western. One should take into account the fact that geopolitical groupings and alliances change with the passing of time , centuries and decades.

A new discipline called Cliodynamics was created in the last decade . It is an area of research using mathematical , quantitative approaches and modelings to explain historical processes and societies. The practitioners of this discipline have made some interesting observations about historical events and have tried to formulate mathematically backed theories to interpret historical facts , however I think they have not found or discovered the right , convenient , correct and/or precise way to mathematize History and historical phenomena .

If the right mathematical theory of human history can be elaborated, using the scientific method and testing hypotheses in history could be equivalent to and lead to the (precise) prediction of important events taking place in the future of humankind.

]]>I will try to give a list of famous , influential books or classic books having a significant historical importance in the fields of physics , astrophysics and astronomy . It’s a somewhat extensive list but it’s not exhaustive.

Starting with Antiquity :

- On the Heavens and Physics (Aristotle) .
- Works by Archimedes related to physics and astronomy , such as On Floating Bodies and The Sand Reckoner .
- De rerum natura or
*On the Nature of Things ,*by Lucretius . *On the Universe*, by Zeno of Citium .- Naturales quaestiones , by Seneca the Younger .
- Almagest , by Ptolemy . The featured image above from Wikipedia represents the edition of the Almagest published in Greek by Johan Heiberg at the end of the nineteenth century .

Then advancing to more recent times:

- Aryabhatiya and Brāhmasphuṭasiddhānta .
*Zīj al-Sindhind*, by Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi .- Book of Optics ,
*Epitome of Astronomy*,*On the Configuration of the World*, and*Doubts Concerning Ptolemy*by Alhazen . *The Mas’udi Canon*, by Al-Biruni .*The Final Quest Concerning the Rectification of Principles*, by Ibn al-Shatir .- Book of Fixed Stars by Abd al-Rahman al-Sufi . Image below from Al-Sufi’s book (free image from Wikipedia).

- De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (
*On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres*) by Nicolaus Copernicus (image source below : :File:De Revolutionibus manuscript p9b.jpg )

- The scientific works of Galileo Galilei , such as Sidereus Nuncius , Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems , and Two New Sciences .
- Dioptrique and The World (Descartes) .
*Experiences nouvelles touchant le vide*(*New experiments concerning Vacuum*) , by Blaise Pascal .

- Astronomy books by Johannes Kepler , such as Harmonices Mundi (
*The Harmony of the World*), Astronomia nova and Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae .

Below is a page from the *Astronomia Nova* (in 1609) showing the three models of planetary motion known in the seventeenth century (free image from Wikipedia) :

- The works of Christiaan Huygens related to physics and astronomy , such as Horologium Oscillatorium ,
*Systema saturnium*, and*Traité de la lumière .* - Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (
*Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy*) and Opticks , by Isaac Newton .(Source of the image below :File:Prinicipia-title.png )

*Synopsis of the Astronomy of Comets*, by Edmond Halley .- Hydrodynamica , by Daniel Bernoulli .(Source of the image below :File:HYDRODYNAMICA, Danielis Bernoulli.png )

*General History of Nature and Theory of the Heavens*, by Immanuel Kant .- Mechanica , by Leonhard Euler .
*Théorie de la figure de la terre*, by Alexis Clairaut .*Traité de dynamique*, by Jean le Rond d’Alembert .*Mécanique Analytique*and papers by Joseph-Louis Lagrange .- Many works and papers by Pierre-Simon Laplace , such as
*Mécanique céleste*,*Théorie du Mouvement et de la figure elliptique des planètes*, and*Exposition du système du monde .* - Theory of the motion of the heavenly bodies moving about the sun in conic sections : a translation of Gauss’s “Theoria motus.” With an appendix : Gauss, Carl Friedrich, 1777-1855 : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

- Papers about optics by Thomas Young (scientist) and Augustin-Jean Fresnel .
- Reflections on the Motive Power of Fire , by Nicolas Léonard Sadi Carnot . Below is an image of the first French edition of Carnot’s book in 1824 (free image from Wikipedia) :

*Théorie analytique de la chaleur*(The Analytic Theory of Heat) , by Joseph Fourier.*Théorie des phénomènes électro-dynamiques, uniquement déduite de l’expérience*, by André-Marie Ampère .*Experimental Researches in Electricity ,*by Michael Faraday .- A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism , A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field , and
*Theory of heat*, by James Clerk Maxwell . *The Mechanical Theory of Heat*, by Rudolf Clausius .*History of the Mathematical Theories of Attraction and Figure of the Earth from Newton to Laplace*, by Isaac Todhunter .*On the Sensations of Tone as a Physiological Basis for the Theory of Music*, by Hermann von Helmholtz .

*The Science of Mechanics*,*The Principles of Physical Optic*s , and*Principles of the Theory of Heat*, by Ernst Mach .*Lectures on Gas Theory*, by Ludwig Boltzmann .- Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics , by Josiah Willard Gibbs .
*Science and Hypothesis*, and*New Methods of Celestial Mechanics*, by Henri Poincaré .*Les Atomes*/*The Atoms*, by Jean Baptiste Perrin .- Works and papers by Max Planck , such as
*The Theory of Heat Radiation*and*Treatise on Thermodynamics .* - The principle of relativity; original papers : Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955 : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
- The collected scientific works and papers of Albert Einstein .
- Scientific papers by Niels Bohr .

*Recherches sur la théorie des quanta*(*Researches on the quantum theory*) , and*The Current Interpretation of Wave Mechanics: A Critical Study*, by Louis de Broglie .*Collected papers*,*The interpretation of Quantum Mechanics*, and*Statistical Thermodynamics*, by Erwin Schrödinger .*The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory*, by Werner Heisenberg .- Books and papers by Paul Dirac , such as The Principles of Quantum Mechanics and
*Lectures on Quantum Field Theory*. *Space, Time and Gravitation: An Outline of the General Relativity Theory*,*The Internal Constitution of Stars*, and*The Nature of the Physical World*, by Arthur Eddington .*Problems of Cosmology and Stellar Dynamics ,**An Introduction to the Kinetic Theory of Gases*, and*The Growth of Physical Science*, by James Hopwood Jeans .*The Theory of Sound*, by John William Strutt, 3rd Baron Rayleigh .*Problems of Atomic Dynamics*,*Atomic Physics*,*Principles of Optics*,*Experiment and Theory in Physics*, and*A General Kinetic Theory of Liquids*, by Max Born .

- Scientific papers and books by Richard Feynman , such as The Feynman Lectures on Physics ,
*Quantum Electrodynamics*,*Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals .* *A History of Astronomy*, by Anton Pannekoek .*An Introduction to the Study of Stellar Structure*,*Radiative Transfer*,*Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability*, and*The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes*, by Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar .*The Eightfold Way*, edited by Murray Gell-Mann and Y. Ne’eman .- Course of Theoretical Physics , by Lev Landau and Evgeny Lifshitz .
*Relativistic Astrophysics (2 volumes)*, by Yakov Borisovich Zel’dovich .- Books and papers by Steven Weinberg , such as
*The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe*,*Gravitation and Cosmology*,*The Quantum Theory of Fields (3 volumes)*, and*A Model of Leptons*.

- Books and papers by David Bohm , such as
*Quantum Theory*,*Causality and Chance in Modern Physics*,*The Undivided Universe.*

Some more recent well known , insightful and/or widely used books would include :

- The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time , by Stephen Hawking and George F. R. Ellis .
*Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics*, by John Stewart Bell .*Classical-Mechanics*, by Herbert Goldstein .*Classical Electrodynamics*, by J.D. Jackson .*Galactic Dynamics*by Binney and Tremaine .*,**The Quantum Theory of Motion: an account of the de Broglie-Bohm Causal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics*, by Peter Holland .*Photons and Atoms: Introduction to Quantum Electrodynamics*, by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji , Gilbert Grynberg and Jacques Dupont-Roc .*Introduction to Elementary Particles*, by D.J. Griffiths .

*Condensed Matter Field Theory*, by Alexander Altland .*The Standard Model and Beyond*, by Paul Langacker .*The Road to Reality*, by Roger Penrose .*Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Search for Unity in Physical Law*, by Peter Woit .*The Trouble With Physics: The Rise of String Theory, The Fall of a Science, and What Comes Next*, by Lee smolin .*Farewell to Reality: How Modern Physics Has Betrayed the Search for Scientific Truth*, by Jim Baggott .

Additional relevant links :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hi…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hi…

]]>Gravitational waves are changes in curvature similar to ripples in space-time . They are an indirect result of the special theory theory of relativity , and were explicitly proposed by Einstein in 1916 in the framework of his theory of general relativity . He showed that the acceleration of mass generates gravitational fields which are time-dependent and are capable of transporting energy (as gravitational radiation ) from their source at the speed of light .

Gravitational waves are quadrupolar in nature , whereas electromagnetic waves are dipolar . Oscillating multipole moments of the mass distribution of a system produce gravitational radiation .

Gravitational waves are quadrupolar in nature , whereas electromagnetic waves are dipolar . Oscillating multipole moments of the mass distribution of a system produce gravitational radiation .

Many attempts have been made to detect gravitational waves , but no direct evidence of their existence has been observed until their recent detection in February 2016 .

The Einstein field equations describe the interactions between space-time curvature and mass , as Maxwell’s equations describe and specify the relationship between electric charge and electromagnetic fields .

The field equations have a solution represented by a weak oscillating perturbation to the curvature of space-time , and this solution is a gravitational wave .

These waves can be regarded as an oscillating perturbation to a flat Minkowski space-time metric , or also as a tidal force oscillating between free test masses , or as a strain oscillating in space-time .

The field equations have a solution represented by a weak oscillating perturbation to the curvature of space-time , and this solution is a gravitational wave .

These waves can be regarded as an oscillating perturbation to a flat Minkowski space-time metric , or also as a tidal force oscillating between free test masses , or as a strain oscillating in space-time .

More explicitly , one can show that a wave equation represents the solutions in free space for the metric perturbations of a nearly flat space-time , with waves propagating at the speed of light ( this is a weak gravitational field approximation) .

One can take a coordinate system where the metric has components :

One can take a coordinate system where the metric has components :

where

is the Minkowski metric in special relativity , and

After some calculations the solution to Einstein’s equations in free space can be written as :

where

So the metric perturbations propagate in free space as waves at the speed of light .

A primary example of a source of gravitational waves is a pair of neutron stars , or two black holes , or one of each type of these astrophysical objects .

Observing supernova explosions or the orbital motion of binary pulsars may possibly give and indirect proof of the existence of gravitational waves .

Observing supernova explosions or the orbital motion of binary pulsars may possibly give and indirect proof of the existence of gravitational waves .

The image below represents gravitational waves generated by two neutron stars orbiting each other (image source : File:Wavy.gif ) :

Ways of detecting gravitational waves include resonant mass detectors , free mass detectors , detectors in space , cosmic background measurements , and monitoring pulsar signals .

External disturbances and the effects of thermal noise in the detecting system should be avoided , the possible interaction between detectors and gravitational waves being very weak .

External disturbances and the effects of thermal noise in the detecting system should be avoided , the possible interaction between detectors and gravitational waves being very weak .

In 1974 Russell Hulse and Joseph Taylor discovered and observed the orbital period of a binary pulsar . They confirmed that the orbit was accelerating at the rate predicted by the emission of gravitational waves according to the theory of general relativity .

The LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) detectors

are used to attempt to observe directly cosmic gravitational waves . They can detect extremely small strains (of the order of one part in 10²¹ ).

are used to attempt to observe directly cosmic gravitational waves . They can detect extremely small strains (of the order of one part in 10²¹ ).

In the quantum theory of gravity , a quantum field whose excitations are gravitons represents the gravitational field .

Gravitons may be regarded as the normal modes of oscillation of a (gravitational) gauge field , produced by a mass current of accelerating masses .

Gravitons may be regarded as the normal modes of oscillation of a (gravitational) gauge field , produced by a mass current of accelerating masses .

To make this answer complete , it should be noted that the expression *gravity waves* is also used to refer to waves studied in oceanography , meteorology and fluid dynamics .

Used in this sense , a gravity wave is a liquid surface layer wave controlled by gravity and not by surface tension .

The surface tension of water becomes unimportant at wavelengths greater than a few centimeters . On the ocean surface or interfaces , all significant waves are gravity waves .

In meteorology , gravity waves are transverse atmospheric waves where the restoring force is caused by the effect of gravity on density and pressure fluctuations .

See for example the Wikipedia article Gravity wave .

Used in this sense , a gravity wave is a liquid surface layer wave controlled by gravity and not by surface tension .

The surface tension of water becomes unimportant at wavelengths greater than a few centimeters . On the ocean surface or interfaces , all significant waves are gravity waves .

In meteorology , gravity waves are transverse atmospheric waves where the restoring force is caused by the effect of gravity on density and pressure fluctuations .

See for example the Wikipedia article Gravity wave .

The expressions *gravity waves* and *gravitational waves* are sometimes used interchangeably for both meanings (i.e. for waves related to general relativity and waves related to fluid dynamics) , so this might cause some confusion.

As an update to the information above , something new took place in the history of the detection of gravitational waves on 11 February 2016 .

“*For the first time, scientists have observed ripples in the fabric of spacetime called gravitational waves, arriving at Earth from a cataclysmic event in the distant universe. This confirms a major prediction of Albert Einstein’s 1915 general theory of relativity and opens an unprecedented new window to the cosmos.[…]*

As and additional note , it is generally preferable to have other precise experiments confirming the detection and presence of gravitational waves.

Classic books or classics may refer to great and historically important books , or to books widely popular , read and used ,or both . I will try to mention both types of books.

I will cite first a number of books which I think are of primary importance in the history of mathematics , and therefore are generally regarded as classics . This is not a exhaustive list .

Let’s start with some books from Antiquity :

- Euclid’s Elements (free versions can be found online). The featured image above from Wikipedia represents the first printed edition of the Elements from 1482 .
- Treatise on conic sections : Apollonius, of Perga : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
- The works of Archimedes : Archimedes : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

Moving a few centuries later to modern times :

- Aryabhatiya
- The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing , by Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi .
- Ars Magna (Gerolamo Cardano)
- La Géométrie by René Descartes . The image below is a free image from archive.org .

- Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica by Isaac Newton .
- Introductio in analysin infinitorum , by Leonhard Euler .
- Mathematical papers by Joseph-Louis Lagrange ,such as “Reflections on the algebraic solutions of equations”.
- Mathematical papers and works by Pierre-Simon Laplace , which can be found in his collected works.
- Disquisitiones Arithmeticae and General investigations of curved surfaces of 1827 and 1825; tr. with notes and a bibliography by James Caddall Morehead and Adam Miller Hiltebeitel. , by Carl Friedrich Gauss . The image below is from Wikipidia :

*An Investigation of the Laws of Thought*, by George Boole .- The mathematical works of Bernhard Riemann .
- Analysis Situs (paper) by Henri Poincaré .
- Leçons sur l’intégration et la recherche des fonctions primitives, professées au Collège de France : Lebesgue, Henri Léon, 1875-1941 : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
- The Foundations of Geometry : Hilbert, David, 1862-1943 : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
- A short account of the history of mathematics : Ball, W. W. Rouse (Walter William Rouse), 1850-1925 : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
*Methods of Mathematical Physics*, by David Hilbert and Richard Courant .- The Absolute Differential Calculus : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
- A Course of Pure Mathematics and An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers , by G. H. Hardy .
- Some books and papers by Albert Einstein are related to (breakthroughs in) physics , other deal with physics and mathematics .
*The Theory of Spinors*, by Élie Cartan .- The Theory of Functions : E.C. Titchmarsh : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive
- The Classical Groups , by Hermann Weyl .
- A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions : G.N. Watson : Free Download & Streaming : Internet Archive

Some recent modern and well known math books that may be regarded as classics :

- Éléments de mathématique , by Nicolas Bourbaki . The image below is a free image of the first edition of Bourbaki’s book about set theory (in French) from Wikipedia .

*Introduction to Geometry*and*Non-Euclidean Geometry*, by Harold Scott MacDonald Coxeter .- Theory of Lie groups by Claude Chevalley .
- Handbook of Mathematical Functions: with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (Dover Books on Mathematics): Milton Abramowitz, Irene A. Stegun: 9780486612720: Amazon.com: Books
*Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics*, by Vladimir Arnold .*Topology*, by James Munkres .- Group Theory and Its Application to Physical Problems (Dover Books on Physics): Morton Hamermesh, Physics: 9780486661810: Amazon.com: Books
- Elementary Theory of Analytic Functions of One or Several Complex Variables (Dover Books on Mathematics): Henri Cartan: 9780486685434: Amazon.com: Books
- Lie Groups: Beyond an Introduction: Anthony W. Knapp: 9780817642594: Amazon.com: Books
- Amazon.com: Principles of Mathematical Analysis (International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics) (International Series in Pure & Applied Mathematics) (9780070542358): Walter Rudin: Books
- Categories for the Working Mathematician by Saunders Mac Lane .
- Amazon.com: Michael Atiyah Collected Works: 6-Volume Set (9780198520948): Michael Atiyah: Books
*Modular Elliptic Curves and Fermat’s Last Theorem*by Andrew Wiles (Wiles’ proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem ) .*Noncommutative Geometry*, by Alain Connes .- The Road to Reality , by Roger Penrose .

See also the following links :

]]>